<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!--
This is 512 bytes of nonsense, since the Firefox 2 developers and IE7
developers and Safari RSS developers decided that they would make
obsolete declared XML styles by overriding them without permission.
Their own styles seem to be of varying quality, and importantly do not
integrate Feedburner's services, which hopefully are of real use to
subscribers and potential subscribers. Therefore, we use this unofficial
workaround, which consists of filling up the first 512 bytes of a
document so that the sniffer doesn't encounter the RSS tag in time to
autodetect it. Now, without further ado, we present you with a valid
XML feed, presented in the manner we have chosen to offer it.
--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">    
    <channel>
    <title>CFR.org - Online Debates</title>
    <link>http://www.cfr.org</link>
    <description>Lively week-long exchanges between two experts on a foreign policy topic in the news, conducted via email and posted on CFR.org.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:08:40 -0400</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:08:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>CFR.org</generator>    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor>webmaster@cfr.org</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@cfr.org</webMaster>
    <copyright>Copyright 2013 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
    <dc:publisher>Council on Foreign Relations</dc:publisher>
    		
        <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.cfr.org/publication/online_debate" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="publication/online_debate" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">publication/online_debate</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
        <title><![CDATA[U.S. Military Intervention for Libya?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/libya/us-military-intervention-libya/p24362?cid=rss-onlinedebates-u.s._military_intervention_for-031811</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:41:13 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;CFR fellows Elliott Abrams and Micah Zenko debate whether the United States and its allies should intervene beyond sanctions on the Qaddafi regime.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=BrjjxLOir60:Ec8_JnoiDD0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=BrjjxLOir60:Ec8_JnoiDD0:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Elliott Abrams and Micah Zenko</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/libya/us-military-intervention-libya/p24362</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Will More Drilling Increase U.S. Energy Security?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/energy-security/more-drilling-increase-us-energy-security/p17327?cid=rss-onlinedebates-will_more_drilling_increase_u.-092408</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:14:32 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Experts debate the degree to which opening more federal lands and waters to drilling will improve U.S. energy security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=iTZllu8OsTU:jYQF7nElh8I:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=iTZllu8OsTU:jYQF7nElh8I:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>David S. Abraham and Iain Murray</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/energy-security/more-drilling-increase-us-energy-security/p17327</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Will Opening Restricted Federal Lands and Waters in the United States Ease Oil Prices?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/economics/opening-restricted-federal-lands-waters-united-states-ease-oil-prices/p16616?cid=rss-onlinedebates-will_opening_restricted_federa-062308</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:22:34 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Sara Banaszak of the American Petroleum Institute and Morgan Gray of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming debate whether opening restricted federal lands and waters will have any effect on the continuing rise in the price of oil.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=dup4gH0b6yM:-BUO5ZjLCMA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=dup4gH0b6yM:-BUO5ZjLCMA:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Sara Banaszak and Morgan Gray</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/economics/opening-restricted-federal-lands-waters-united-states-ease-oil-prices/p16616</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Should the U.S. Support the UN's Responsibility to Protect Doctrine?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/sovereignty/should-us-support-uns-responsibility-protect-doctrine/p16285?cid=rss-onlinedebates-should_the_u.s._support_the_un-051908</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:37:34 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;CFR Senior Fellow Stewart M. Patrick and Steven Groves of the Heritage Foundation debate the merits of supporting the Responsibility to Protect doctrine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=rG7d8-TfNA8:xMVs0Fxsw3A:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=rG7d8-TfNA8:xMVs0Fxsw3A:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Stewart M. Patrick and Steven Groves</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/sovereignty/should-us-support-uns-responsibility-protect-doctrine/p16285</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Has the Surge Put Iraq on the Path to Success?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/iraq/has-surge-put-iraq-path-success/p16185?cid=rss-onlinedebates-has_the_surge_put_iraq_on_the_-050508</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:16:43 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Two CFR experts on the war, Max Boot, senior fellow for national security studies, and Steven Simon, senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies, debate whether the surge has put Iraq on the path to success.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=YjSZezoVVCM:q2ZOdWy1NGY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=YjSZezoVVCM:q2ZOdWy1NGY:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Max Boot and Steven Simon</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/iraq/has-surge-put-iraq-path-success/p16185</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Should Hamas Be Included in the Mideast Peace Process?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/israel/should-hamas-included-mideast-peace-process/p16116?cid=rss-onlinedebates-should_hamas_be_included_in_th-042808</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:24:23 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Two Mideast experts weigh the merits of isolating or engaging the terrorist group. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=fH2qjVmAplI:TAVEMwc1TG8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=fH2qjVmAplI:TAVEMwc1TG8:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Mohamad Bazzi and Robert Satloff</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/israel/should-hamas-included-mideast-peace-process/p16116</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[The United States and Shifting Global Power Dynamics]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/us-strategy-and-politics/united-states-shifting-global-power-dynamics/p16002?cid=rss-onlinedebates-the_united_states_and_shifting-041408</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Two experts discuss how the United States should confront shifts in global political power in the 21st century.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=Eebu3QjXctw:CTyuXDq6n5U:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=Eebu3QjXctw:CTyuXDq6n5U:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Nina L. Hachigian and Parag Khanna</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/us-strategy-and-politics/united-states-shifting-global-power-dynamics/p16002</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Should the Next U.S. President Adopt a Tougher Stance on Trade Policy with China?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/china/should-next-us-president-adopt-tougher-stance-trade-policy-china/p15888?cid=rss-onlinedebates-should_the_next_u.s._president-040208</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:11:09 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Robert Scott of the Economic Policy Institute and Daniel Ikenson of the Cato Institute debate how the next U.S. president should deal with China on trade.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=8C44om7zQz8:rJdRzldNC8w:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=8C44om7zQz8:rJdRzldNC8w:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Robert E. Scott and Daniel J. Ikenson</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/china/should-next-us-president-adopt-tougher-stance-trade-policy-china/p15888</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[What Should the Next President Do on NAFTA?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/trade/should-next-president-do-nafta/p15704?cid=rss-onlinedebates-what_should_the_next_president-031108</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:06:12 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Jeffrey J. Schott, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and Thea M. Lee, policy director for the AFL-CIO, debate what the next president should do on the North American Free Trade Agreement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=KBrFvWBwSpw:5PWSqe_olFw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=KBrFvWBwSpw:5PWSqe_olFw:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Jeffrey J. Schott and Thea M. Lee</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/trade/should-next-president-do-nafta/p15704</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[When Should the U.S. Withdraw From Iraq?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/iraq/should-us-withdraw-iraq/p15586?cid=rss-onlinedebates-when_should_the_u.s._withdraw_-022508</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:24:37 -0500</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Ted Galen Carpenter of the Cato Institute and James Phillips of the Heritage Foundation debate the merits of withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=HaTSpe8mx1g:WLGLs8kiFCI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=HaTSpe8mx1g:WLGLs8kiFCI:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Ted Galen Carpenter and James Phillips</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/iraq/should-us-withdraw-iraq/p15586</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Who Should Lead Post-Conflict Reconstruction?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/nation-building/should-lead-post-conflict-reconstruction/p15426?cid=rss-onlinedebates-who_should_lead_post_conflict_-021508</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:18:05 -0500</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Craig Cohen of the Center for Strategic and International Studies and Col. Garland H. Williams of the Army Management Staff College debate who should lead the United States&amp;rsquo; post-conflict reconstruction efforts, the military or civilians.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=iRKMDeWjYk0:TNSIYlFExLg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=iRKMDeWjYk0:TNSIYlFExLg:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Craig Cohen and Col. Garland H. Williams</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/nation-building/should-lead-post-conflict-reconstruction/p15426</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Policy for the Next President: Fair Trade or Free Trade]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/trade/policy-next-president-fair-trade-free-trade/p15358?cid=rss-onlinedebates-policy_for_the_next_president_-012808</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:59:18 -0500</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Jonathan Jacoby of the Center for American Progress and Robert Lane Greene of the Economist debate the shape of trade policy for the next U.S. administration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=ZzvDRtfxDIc:lHJBBrm9JbE:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=ZzvDRtfxDIc:lHJBBrm9JbE:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Jonathan Jacoby and Robert Lane Greene</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/trade/policy-next-president-fair-trade-free-trade/p15358</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Should the United States Recognize Kosovo?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/kosovo/should-united-states-recognize-kosovo/p15098?cid=rss-onlinedebates-should_the_united_states_recog-121907</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:48:51 -0500</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Two policy experts discuss potential scenarios that could play out if Kosovo declares independence and the United States honors its national sovereignty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=vm9CEqYVc5o:OGsBDKgVJR4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=vm9CEqYVc5o:OGsBDKgVJR4:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Marshall F. Harris and Alan J. Kuperman</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/kosovo/should-united-states-recognize-kosovo/p15098</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Private Security Contractors]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/afghanistan/private-security-contractors/p15032?cid=rss-onlinedebates-private_security_contractors-121107</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:59:31 -0500</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Doug Brooks, president of the International Peace Operations Association, and Erica Razook, a legal fellow for the Business and Human Rights Program at Amnesty International USA, debate the practical and legal issues surrounding private security contractors in war zones.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=KGjdEzb-QrM:tpPcTzHwMDg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=KGjdEzb-QrM:tpPcTzHwMDg:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Doug Brooks and Erica Razook</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/afghanistan/private-security-contractors/p15032</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Nuclear Power in Response to Climate Change]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/energy/nuclear-power-response-climate-change/p14718?cid=rss-onlinedebates-nuclear_power_in_response_to_c-110807</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:12:11 -0500</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Michael Mariotte of the Nuclear Information and Resource Service and Steven Kerekes at the Nuclear Energy Institute debate the role of nuclear power in climate change policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=qRSUrGbt6JM:HN1SQlw3N1o:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=qRSUrGbt6JM:HN1SQlw3N1o:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Michael Mariotte and Steven Kerekes</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/energy/nuclear-power-response-climate-change/p14718</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[U.S.-Mexico Security Cooperation]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/mexico/us-mexico-security-cooperation/p14594?cid=rss-onlinedebates-u.s._mexico_security_cooperati-103007</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:32:36 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Armand Peschard-Sverdrup, senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and Jorge Chabat, professor at Centro de Investigaci&amp;oacute;n y Docencia Econ&amp;oacute;micas (CIDE) in Mexico City, debate what an ideal security cooperation agreement would look like between the United States and Mexico. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=H5MzIa7ubl0:W7l-CRjrFak:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=H5MzIa7ubl0:W7l-CRjrFak:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Armand Peschard-Sverdrup and Jorge Chabat</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/mexico/us-mexico-security-cooperation/p14594</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Are Immigrants a Homeland Security Risk?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/immigration/immigrants-homeland-security-risk/p14660?cid=rss-onlinedebates-are_immigrants_a_homeland_secu-102907</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:05:25 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Two experts debate the extent to which U.S. security is affected by immigration. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=ZW2NVda76vQ:zTy3eVlgu2c:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=ZW2NVda76vQ:zTy3eVlgu2c:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>James Jay Carafano and Mark Krikorian</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/immigration/immigrants-homeland-security-risk/p14660</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Can Sanctions Be Effective in Halting Iran's Nuclear Program?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/iran/can-sanctions-effective-halting-irans-nuclear-program/p14500?cid=rss-onlinedebates-can_sanctions_be_effective_in_-101507</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:16:23 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Matthew Levitt of the Washington Institute and Peter Crail of the Arms Control Association debate the merits of using sanctions to try to force Iran to suspend its uranium enrichment program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=pzwriwqHNKw:1jUvtMz2F9s:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=pzwriwqHNKw:1jUvtMz2F9s:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Matthew Levitt and Peter Crail</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/iran/can-sanctions-effective-halting-irans-nuclear-program/p14500</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Should the United States Continue Supporting Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/pakistan/should-united-states-continue-supporting-pakistans-president-pervez-musharraf/p14333?cid=rss-onlinedebates-should_the_united_states_conti-100107</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:08:25 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Hassan Abbas of Harvard University and Moeed Yusuf, director of strategic studies at the Islamabad-based think tank Strategic and Economic Policy Research, discuss whether the United States should continue its support of President Musharraf. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=l0zf9WIdo3M:enPyyhfVCag:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=l0zf9WIdo3M:enPyyhfVCag:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Hassan Abbas and Moeed Yusuf</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/pakistan/should-united-states-continue-supporting-pakistans-president-pervez-musharraf/p14333</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Violence by the Numbers in Iraq: Sound Data or Shaky Statistics?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/iraq/violence-numbers-iraq-sound-data-shaky-statistics/p14296?cid=rss-onlinedebates-violence_by_the_numbers_in_ira-092507</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:24:25 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Lawrence J. Korb of the Center for American Progress and CFR's Stephen Biddle debate the accuracy of American military statistics on violence in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=iuZ127rDo_4:2seN2OYYIVY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=iuZ127rDo_4:2seN2OYYIVY:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Lawrence J. Korb and Stephen Biddle</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/iraq/violence-numbers-iraq-sound-data-shaky-statistics/p14296</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Can Coal-to-Liquid Transportation Fuel be Considered an Alternative Fuel?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/energy-security/can-coal--liquid-transportation-fuel-considered-alternative-fuel/p13942?cid=rss-onlinedebates-can_coal_to_liquid_transportat-073007</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:18:36 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nrdc.org"&gt;Elizabeth Martin Perera&lt;/a&gt;, a climate policy analyst for the Natural Resources Defense Council, and &lt;a href="http://erg.berkeley.edu/erg/people/faculty/farrell.shtml"&gt;Alex Farrell&lt;/a&gt;, director of UC Berkley&amp;rsquo;s Transportation Sustainability Research Center, discuss the merits and challenges of coal-to-liquids as an alternative fuel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=UAWAxyHYBqQ:krzPg4Et4es:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=UAWAxyHYBqQ:krzPg4Et4es:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Elizabeth Martin Perera and Alex Farrell</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/energy-security/can-coal--liquid-transportation-fuel-considered-alternative-fuel/p13942</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Are Economic Sanctions Good Foreign Policy?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/international-finance/economic-sanctions-good-foreign-policy/p13853?cid=rss-onlinedebates-are_economic_sanctions_good_fo-072307</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:05:59 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Simon Cox of the &lt;em&gt;Economist&lt;/em&gt; and Jake Colvin of the National Foreign Trade Council debate the merits and drawbacks of economic sanctions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=Yg0u5Jeojtg:3ChiF2esAmQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=Yg0u5Jeojtg:3ChiF2esAmQ:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Jake Colvin and Simon Cox</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/international-finance/economic-sanctions-good-foreign-policy/p13853</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Should Guantanamo Bay Be Closed?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/terrorism-and-the-law/should-guantanamo-bay-closed/p13725?cid=rss-onlinedebates-should_guantanamo_bay_be_close-070907</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 09:56:14 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;James Jay Carafano of the Heritage Foundation and Gabor Rona of Human Rights First debate the merits of shutting down the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=vQi1MuVGxlI:2r1JUDn91RY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=vQi1MuVGxlI:2r1JUDn91RY:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>James Jay Carafano and Gabor Rona</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/terrorism-and-the-law/should-guantanamo-bay-closed/p13725</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[How Should the United States Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/climate-change/should-united-states-regulate-greenhouse-gas-emissions/p13646?cid=rss-onlinedebates-how_should_the_united_states_r-062507</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:18:04 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;William A. Pizer, senior fellow at Resources for the Future, and Kenneth P. Green, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, debate how the United States should regulate greenhouse gas emissions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=ncCjOf1QjGA:p5HKDA6CEUg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=ncCjOf1QjGA:p5HKDA6CEUg:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>William A. Pizer and Kenneth P. Green</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/climate-change/should-united-states-regulate-greenhouse-gas-emissions/p13646</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Should Labor Standards Have a Role in U.S. Trade Agreements?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/trade/should-labor-standards-have-role-us-trade-agreements/p13576?cid=rss-onlinedebates-should_labor_standards_have_a_-061107</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:14:14 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Charles Kernaghan of the National Labor Committee and Claude Barfield of the American Enterprise Institute debate the merits of labor standards in trade pacts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=Gw3N5lvkeaA:lN_UBbRaeIg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=Gw3N5lvkeaA:lN_UBbRaeIg:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Charles Kernaghan and Claude R. Barfield</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/trade/should-labor-standards-have-role-us-trade-agreements/p13576</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Will India Eclipse China?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/india/india-eclipse-china/p13525?cid=rss-onlinedebates-will_india_eclipse_china?-060407</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:17:46 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;CFR's Manjeet N. Kripalani and Adam Segal debate whether India will overtake China.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=fd4uPv3f8HU:K5WC6AC6CP4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=fd4uPv3f8HU:K5WC6AC6CP4:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Adam Segal and Manjeet Kripalani</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/india/india-eclipse-china/p13525</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[What Role Should the U.S. Play in Somalia?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/somalia/role-should-us-play-somalia/p13425?cid=rss-onlinedebates-what_role_should_the_u.s._play-052107</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 10:15:45 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;A pair of Somalia experts, Terrence Lyons and Sadia Ali Aden, discuss U.S. policy options for the war-torn nation on Africa's Horn. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=-k2-Hgz4r5o:eratHcDh_KQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=-k2-Hgz4r5o:eratHcDh_KQ:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Terrence Lyons and Sadia Ali Aden</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/somalia/role-should-us-play-somalia/p13425</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Should Regime Change in Iran be Part of U.S. Foreign Policy?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/iran/should-regime-change-iran-part-us-foreign-policy/p13199?cid=rss-onlinedebates-should_regime_change_in_iran_b-043007</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:33:39 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Robert Litwak of the Woodrow Wilson Center and Michael Rubin of the American Enterprise Institute debate whether regime change in Iran should be part of U.S. foreign policy. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=pr0MLhz_sCI:FrVs9_0RhY4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=pr0MLhz_sCI:FrVs9_0RhY4:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Robert S. Litwak and Michael Rubin</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/iran/should-regime-change-iran-part-us-foreign-policy/p13199</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Should the United States Cut Its Farm Subsidies?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/trade/should-united-states-cut-its-farm-subsidies/p13147?cid=rss-onlinedebates-should_the_united_states_cut_i-042307</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:29:18 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Daniel T. Griswold of the Cato Institute and Bob Young of the American Farm Bureau debate whether American farm subsidies should be maintained.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=TUjaiXvxoF0:akLK32wOHK4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=TUjaiXvxoF0:akLK32wOHK4:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Daniel T. Griswold and Bob Young</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/trade/should-united-states-cut-its-farm-subsidies/p13147</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    		
        <item>
        <title><![CDATA[How Likely is a Nuclear Terrorist Attack on the United States?]]></title>

        <link>http://www.cfr.org/weapons-of-mass-destruction/likely-nuclear-terrorist-attack-united-states/p13097?cid=rss-onlinedebates-how_likely_is_a_nuclear_terror-041607</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:00:40 -0400</pubDate>
        <publication_type>Online Debate</publication_type>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;CFR's Michael A. Levi and Harvard's Graham T. Allison consider the likelihood of catastrophic nuclear terrorism in the United States.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=8xUZPVEt_ws:veivPlk68CA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.cfr.org/~ff/publication/online_debate?a=8xUZPVEt_ws:veivPlk68CA:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/publication/online_debate?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
        <dc:creator>Michael A. Levi and Graham T. Allison</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfr.org/weapons-of-mass-destruction/likely-nuclear-terrorist-attack-united-states/p13097</guid>
                        </item>
		
		    </channel>
</rss>
